competitive analysis

The machine I'm trying to produce is going to be many years later, but there's been progress in it.
http://www.livescience.com/8844-brain-machine-reads-minds-modest-breakthrough.html
The mind reader machine advocated by scientists is more for the medical field. They're trying to analyze seizures patients more and understand which neurons fire when they think of a certain celebrity.
One outcome of this is that, “if the patient learns to control neurons perfectly, instead of having the image appear on the screen you can connect his brain to a cursor,” Cerf said.
 The difference between their's and mine is mine is the next step in the learning process. Being a student for 20 years, I think it's really important to be learning as efficiently as possible.

The other  similar machine is
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/7987821/Mind-reading-machine-can-convert-thoughts-into-speech.html
also created by scientists. This machine allows people to convert their thoughts and brain waves into speech by a computer. The intended audience for them is also patients, but paralyzed patients instead. Think Stephen Hawking and Professor Xavier. They want to give a chance to paralyzed patients to be able to communicate with normal people again.

So my machine benefits all students because one's thought process while learning is undeniably critical in the learning process. The ability to write down your thought process in an instant is almost science fictional, but the day will come soon that people won't need to look at the teacher, then to the blackboard, then quickly jot down a big mass of notes. Also, these 2 science machines utilize electrodes attached to the brain. Maybe I will use a computer chip, given Moore's Law of the number of transistors on a circuit doubling every 2 years. Maybe 10 years later, the strength and power of a computer chip will be so great it can send information to the tablet remotely.